Three months ago I wrote about a feature-workflow plugin that added structure to how I work with Claude Code. Capture ideas, plan them, implement them, ship them. The structure helped — I stopped losing track of what I was building mid-session and started actually finishing things.
But the review step was weak. The plugin had its own internal review skill, and Claude was reviewing its own code but it was too agreeable. The same blind spots persisted across features. I'd work on something and it would take several iterations of testing before it was functional.
The plugin is now at v7, and the biggest change is that internal review is gone entirely. It's been replaced with external reviewers — different AI models running in separate terminals, reading the implementation and writing independent critiques using a different client. The process is slower but I believe it's made me faster and producing more reliable code.